54247/9/48
Hong Kong.
dk. H. K. (16)
15th June, 1940.
On the byth Boy you role to Creech Joncs
104
12
concerning on ppeal made to you by Sub-Inspectore 1. Faul the Michard Brown of the Bong Long Police Force requesting recognition of their previous police service.
I have now loosed into their reprisentations and find that most of the points they raise have already been fully considered, both by the Hong Kong, Government und myself. Nevertheless, as Mr. Sol and Mr. Brown seen to be under some misapprehension, I cannot to better than give you specific replies to the points made in their letters,
On the meation of recognition for pension purposes of ta ir Hone police service, it would appar that peregroch 4 of the Colonial Secretorte letter (reference 7/1661/470) of the 4th March, of which letter Mr. boul ese dr. Bro...n both attacked co-ies in writing to you, does not apply to them. The puregrepa in question is eppliceblu to ea-leabers of the United Fingeon County and Borough Police force, serving in the Hong Kong Police and does not apply to ea-Metropolitan policemen, which Mr. beul en Ar. Brown LIS. The attention of the Governor of Hong kong is being drawn to the apparent misunderstacing which has arisen ov r this paragraph. dr. Saul and Mr. Bro.n n.v. clready been told that, for pension purposes, they are regarded as having been temporarily transferred to the Hong Kong Police. nesas in cfinct that, on their subee went r tiresent from
This
John Patti 7, BSc., J.P., 8.c., F.R. v. k.
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.